Inside fashion is a very popular category of all online magazines. One who repeatedly allows us insights into what is happening within the fashion industry and thought. Sometimes I wonder though: how thinks all the rest about all this now? About so much frippery like with Gucci for example. The label offers plenty for discussions for ravings on the one hand and eye-rolling on the other side finally already under very fashion-savvy contemporaries. I stared with a coffee in hand and may be slightly sabbernd, but definitely lost in thought on my screen that showed me the resort collection of 2017 said Italian label as a slideshow, then rang suddenly the phone. My 600 kilometers distant best friend was on the phone. Yannick, 29, Psychology student in its death throes and also the’s and at the same time kernigste, as conservator, psychiatry has ever seen. “How you doing?” it whistles through the handset. “See pictures”, I answer. “And: do you want to see?” — “Clear”.
I am, frankly, assumed a few second after the completed transfer of the links to the collection at the other end of the line to hear nothing but laughter, including no less verbal polemics. I would have to understand even it. But nothing of the sort happened. Pretty narrow-minded thought of me. From a then via Skype while lightly depressing back and forth a new category was born thus: fashion from the outside:
Yannick, tell me something: you have ever ever heard of Gucci?
And what are you thinking here?
Mhhh, something between very expensive, so luxurious, and somehow extremely cheap in absurd way. Maybe because the brand is so frequently counterfeited.
You mean the logo bags and belt, which frequently encounter in the car intended. A genuine Gucci-logo-T-shirt there again soon by the way really to buy. I think Yes, Gucci takes it even a bit on the pokes fun at, I like that. Deliciously ironically so to speak:
But also challenging. I think, who wears this shirt, whatever, is scrupulously pay close attention to the corresponding code, to not be confused with impostors to. It’s done now so: wear a torn pair of jeans, but for a designer handbag. Stupid only that people like me can read this code, for example in the form of proper footwear, usually did not. I would think so probably still diesesT-shirt had fallen off a truck somewhere. In conjunction with the rock the whole I like but again. Doesn’t add up, but then Yes again somehow. I would look at least twice, if the lady there against me.
Then imagine, someone friends came forward with this golden gem of belt on the street – your first thought?
Chic, but very, very big. So enormously. Still elegant. I would still wonder why that should be. However on the common, but on the way was interested.
What do you think why that should be?
Because you want to be beautiful. Perhaps one combines the beauty and elegance when wearing with certain brands. That seems to me indeed mysterious, but it will be likely. It buys more or less not only this belt, but the whole image.
The image from which you’re talking has changed really at Gucci. Alessandro Michele, the new Chief Designer, has virtually reinvented before a few seasons the brand. Look, here are more looks of the latest collection:
All like me really a lot better than what I associate with Gucci classic naive and without knowledge of the industry. Because I believe that clothes itself in the foreground is out of and less the brand. And I see my full attention since the collection has combinations I so still didn’t know, so for a moment. I need to find naturally beautiful everything, so so beautiful, that I would wear it myself, this is a very subjective sense anyway. But it is a pleasure to look at the crazy dresses me. I get it, you want to cheer the people today also a bit far and motivate.
There are pretty many people who now loudly scold and screaming “ugly”! While I find the collection puts it in a nutshell: fashion must again be much more fun.
Ugly I do not find the friendly at all. But very brave. Who wears it, must have the courage, to have fun. And fun, nothing can be wrong.
Even if it be shown cats on sweaters that are outrageously expensive?
The fun stops of course in this case on the own financial limit and that is Yes nunmal very individual. I myself would spend less money, but I can well understand if others do. As long as they really can afford it no matter if by the shifting of priorities of the wealth. Everything else is unhealthy. Psychologically is it of such brands also have been sent to make products artificially expensive. So a sweater, for example, which is in no relation to a dress from insane materials. But the price value is suggested. And maybe even good taste. Whether it actually is good taste, is argumentative. People buy the sweater but probably either way.
There, you can again discuss how much can be lead around many a consumer on the nose. According to the motto: Gucci has arrived so suddenly around the corner, the cat makes the topic and poom – at once all the creatures find great. Or maybe rather helping Gucci just to look at things from a different perspective? This is probably the question: pure stashes or pleasant horizons extension?
I think this is exactly the whole point of (fashionable) innovation. People out of the comfort zone to lure to provide them new opportunities. But of course, Gucci can benefit from its own name, the Manab is a product of their own past. I imagine so that: as a company like Gucci must be already part something in the sand, so the mass remembers that she has to do it with crap. Somehow, at the same time, companies are but judge and executioner. More generally, I think it is more dangerous to be bored as to provoke.
Do you also think I would be viewed at an angle in so a Gucci outfit on the road?
Yes, it’s definitely weird. It’s probably on the context. In Berlin, you probably do, this on the country were people are probably staring at you and look irritated and shocked from the laundry. Here, the ruling is probably even more from the viewer depending on as in a belt.
I’m Yes anyway completely stuck in the fashion bubble bubble and therefore sometimes wonder where all the problem is buried, if I enter the supermarket in our hometown in glistening boots. And it’s not me Gucci – or not-Gucci. Is Yes, don’t care where the shoe is coming.
Well, Germany is in the fashionable ways anyway already very conservative, I think. Is fashion just not an integral part of the culture, right? Anyway, it behaves here in principle quite different than for example in Italy. And then this skepticism about new and unfamiliar, or people who behave differently than oneself, which is here deeply rooted in the people. Maybe a consequence of our political past.
It is also healthy, to have an opinion. But why is it often in fashion so negative?
Fashion is a very disskutierbare form, to express themselves, alone, because it is so visible. Thus, it offers a huge attack surface already at the very first glance. We are of course also a very compliant people and it is no secret that we deal with the personal others and tend to find the fly in the ointment. In Bolivia, where I was, it is, for example, very different. There, the women dress also very feminine and body stresses. The other women deal with always very positive, we celebrate each other and body are also no shady ulterior motive. Here, is according to my own experience, different. There rumored likes whispered. Maybe so, because it is subconsciously envious that you even runaway? Or because we have had so long indoctrinated that a woman has to be good. And adapted.
Have you not told recently that: “Most women dress but no longer for the man, but for other women”?
Yes, I was. It is the most men I know, doesn’t really matter, how to dress a woman. Of course, a pretty dress is already not bad. But a wide pair of jeans with a T-Shirt can be Yes exactly as exciting as a conspicuous clothes. Mode triggers in women, however, may be the own, narcissistic side. It compares you much more — or so it seems.
Gucci men’s and women’s fashion now, by the way, on the same runway, also shows because the gender boundaries become increasingly blurred. How realistic do you think it, that the mass is freed from fixed (fashionable) role performances?
I doubt that our society is so far to free themselves. To do this she should only once all other principles understand also the freedom of own. Where, in the 80s, it was almost ever so far. Prince, Bowie… This movement was not really sustainable, we have fallen back more, or? Maybe we’re stuck here in a hamster wheel, which is always powered by economics and politics. We love to belong, so we love also conformity in some manner. This slows down. Anyway, if I am a my environment look around. Since very few dare what, because falling up is not so much desired.
Is there a classification of fashion in the categories for you favorable/unfavorable? It’s mostly that really matter. I think mainly what I am beautiful.
But yes, in the end you must feel only. I believe that should be the only item of fashion.
Would you like to live in a fashionably more open society?
Yes. Then I would have more courage.
For something like this for example?
Funny Best Friend Memes of 2016 on SIZZLE
Pernille Teisbaek and How to Do Street Style the Stealth …
Best 25+ Gucci ideas on Pinterest
best friend outfits
Taylor Swift’s Gucci Snake Boots
THREE BEST FRIEND T-SHIRT (I KNOW SHE’S CZ./SHE THINKS I’M …
U0026quot;Jimin Inspired Outfitu0026quot; By Btsoutfits …
Snapchat problems › thefashionfraction.com
Kerry Washington from Gucci LACMA Art + Film Gala Red Carpet
Snakeskin Print Kimono for Spring
Street Style: The best spring looks from Toronto Fashion Week
GUCCI WHITE/RED/BLUE TIGER EMBROIDERY ACE LEATHER SNEAKERS …
Le Fashion: An Admirable Look To Copy This Winter
Gucci Kids Collection | Designer Kids Clothes
25+ Best Memes About Constant Contact
Dress: love maegan, tank top, jewels, sunglasses
Best Friendship Quotes of the Week – Quotes Words Sayings
GUCCI NEW ACE PIERCED HEART LEATHER SNEAKERS, WHITE
Best 25+ Soho style ideas on Pinterest